That’s why they call it the blues

Examinations, especially law school examinations are anti-climactical at best. My contracts exam was no different.

When he walked into our classroom, on the first day of class, our contracts professor, Anthony Chase, told us “Contracts are about the blues. You’ve done me wrong and now you have to make it right.” After our examination on Tuesday, Prof. Chase has several members of our class singing the blues. We had a 178 question multiple choice exam. ‘Not too bad’ you may say but this 178 question beast had to be finished in 3 hours. So that’s 180minutes for 178 questions so a little over a minute per question. ‘Still not too bad’, I hear the peanut gallery retort, but what if I told you that many of the questions were a half page to a page long? Do you think you could just finish reading a question like that in under a minute?

 I’m grateful that I can read rather quickly. What my comprehension is at that rate of speed I’m not sure but I felt like I got a good effort in. Many of my classmates were clamouring for an essay based exam. As if that would be any fairer. We’re all subject to the grade curve anyway. Some of the smartest people in our class still turned in their exams in before time, so has anything really changed? I don’t know. All will be revealed when grades come out. And then the real reason anyone was really fighting for great grades - Law Review- will have been decided.

As first year law students we hang so much of our hopes and dreams on the sharp precipice that is the Law Review cut-off. Eager to make a Faustian bargain just to be privy to the academic elite and walk behind the law school velvet rope to be part of Law Review. Is it all worth it? Is it all that it’s cracked up to be? I don’t know. I want in as much as the next guy.

Law school and Law review in the end is just like any competitive endeavour really. Like making the finals in the Olympics for example. The unfortunate reality is that people seem to only remember who won.

Grades of Glory

The newest crop of law school rankings have been out for a while and I’m quite surprised that I haven’t put my two cents in about the whole mess. Former UH Law Center Dean Nancy R. chimed in with a string of posts about the whole ranking madness and even put a spreadsheet together. Now when I pitched an awkward social analogy about rankings to Gilman he didn’t take to it but I offer it up here for you to decide.

I reckon law school rankings are like the Miss USA/Universe pageant. When your daughter/ sister/ girlfriend/ cousin/ neighbour/ local girl/ city girl/ state girl/ national girl wins everyone oohs and aahs about how great the Miss USA/World is, about how important it is to showcase local cultures so on and so forth ad nauseam. But when aforementioned young lady doesn’t win ( or some other lady wins who you don’t care about) you’ll say, ‘Oh what do those things mean anyway…their just an excuse for women to be degraded etc etc’.

I think rankings for schools are somewhat the same. I think it’s wonderful that U.S. News took the effort and initiative to quantify somethings about law school that are important such as Student/faculty ratios which I think are a wonderful metric to measure. But when you try and quantify the unquantifiable such as ‘reputation’ and put a disproportionate amount of weight to such criteria you will get a very skewed perception of what is reality.

So while I think that it is important for law schools and all schools for that matter to be concerned with metrics such as minority enrollment, tenured faculty, scholarships etc. there are some things that remain to be seen, felt and heard that no ranking will ever give you.

This was very much the topic of conversation in today’s Contracts Class with the ever-voluble Tony Chase. How do you deal with expressly subjective terms in contract you’re supposed to evaluate objectively? 

Here you see the need for the world to come to objective, quantifiable & determinate states on things that don’t necessarily lend themselves to such segregation. Now there’s something to think about.