Now that I’m in “Work you to death phase”…..

Fellow 2L law school victim, Luke Gilman echoed the oft-repeated truism of the ladder of law school life which goes something like this: “Scare you to death, Work you to death, Bore you to death”. These allegedly represent your three years (in my case 3.5-4yrs) in law school.

I don’t think I was ever really scared my first year. Okay maybe a little when my hair started falling out and when my cholesterol shot up 45points in 6weeks. But it wasn’t out of fear. I was just burdened more than I had ever been before. So I thought.

My 2L year is a kaleidoscope of multiple bright points that however small unto themselves, have this aggregate effect of making me feel like I’m on the rack. While I can’t tell you enough about how much I’m actually learning about methamphetamine production and use ( courtesy of the Houston Journal of International Law) and spousal abuse and infliction of emotional distress (My Moot Court arguments); I will say that along with that and my classes in Constitutional Law with Prof. Peter Linzer (probably the most interesting class I’ve taken in law school thus far) and Family Law with Prof. Tom Oldham, my cup certainly runneth over.

I will have to also account for Factor X, in this regard, who sailed into my life mid-summer. I guess no man, not even this Brown Boy, can live as an island, so I’ve now found myself juggling many-a-thing besides law school and a full-time job. I certainly do hope that the “bore you to death” phase is all that it’s cracked up to be. I for one am looking forward to the day in law school, when I can confidently say “gosh I’ve got nothing to do”.

Administrative Law with Prof. Bush

This post along with the many that are fluttering around my head is long overdue. One of the things that I promised I would do on this blog is give you the reader (note the singular for a reason….) my two cents on the classes I take and law school in general.

First the course: Alright, I don’t know why Administrative law isn’t on the bar and why it isn’t a course everyone is running to take. Perhaps the fact that the reading is quite onerous and tortured. There’s a thought. Nonetheless I think that the material we covered in Administrative law was so painfully interesting (painful here was not used lightly) that you couldn’t help but be interested in the stuff. The fact that almost anything you deal with these days runs through some quasi-adjudicatory forum such as administrative law courts makes me wonder why the masses aren’t clamouring for this class. I’m thrilled to bits I took it. Between the Admin law class and trying to write-on for law review, I almost sold my soul, almost discovered barbituates and a host of poor health practices that I am glad I didn’t turn to. Such was the nature of my Summer. Something I have regrettably come to terms with since skipping summers isn’t really an option but I’m trying to make it so in 2008.

Interesting tid-bits of Admin Law, is: if you’ve got to deal with the FTC ( and if you’re in any kind of business, you always have to deal with the FTC) or if you pay taxes to the IRS ( and if you’re into those schemes those guys on the internet sell, you’re already too far gone) or deal with any kind of regulatory agencys (like the FAA, EPA, FCC and other equally ugly government acronyms) you need administrative law.

What’s sad is that city councils, home owners associations and the like all don’t pay enough heed to the principles of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) because if you make rash ill-thought decisions not based on the record or propose and impose rules without due process, the lords of Admin law will come a-bustin your chops. Don’t say I didn’t warn you!

I will say Prof. Darren Bush, did his best to teach this class. Arguably the Punniest professor I’ve had so far. Also the only professor to do a real review of the class that one could actually use instead of the “ask me a question and I’ll answer it” format for class review that pervades academia.

Will warn the masses that he has a curious exam methodology. You get the exam questions a few days before and can even answer the entire thing but you can only bring your answer outline in with you besides any other text etc. Different. Made me sweat for 3days working on the thing. More like 2 days because I didn’t even go past reading the thing on the day I got it. We’ll see it all turned out soon enough.

To summarise: Would I take Admin law if I could do it over again? Yes sir/ma’am.  Should you? You’d be a fool not to.

300: The Law School Edition

 Discovered while cutting through the 1L study carrels at the UH Law Center. You have been forewarned incoming 1Ls!

Spartan Warning

A new class, a new beginning? Perhaps the beginning of the end

Being in law school and taking breaks from it is like suffering from a post-traumatic stress disorder. When you’re going through the stress stimuli, the world’s quite often a blur and you’re bursting with responses and reactions and you’re so overwhelmed that you don’t say much. When it’s over because you’re so overwhelmed you often don’t know where to begin. That’s why I’ve been silent for the past few weeks. Savouring my time away from law school, discovering that I still had friends that were willing to speak with me after many moons of neglect and just the ability to not spend much time in front of my laptop has kept me from blogging. Now that the summer semester is upon us however, it’s back to the old ways.

This summer features Property Law with a visiting professor from Chapman School of Law, Donald Kochan , who not only has a website going, but some degree of progressive pedagogical thought, enough to be willing to have a mid semester practice exam, reviews thereafter and even posting old exams online. I hear the rumblings in the cobwebbed halls of legal academia already.

Property Law is my crash course into the world of economics. Having been a tech-geek for far too long, I’m glad I decided to pursue law because I would have never been exposed to much of the thinking, literary linkage or historical lessons that the study of law affords me. I mean where else can you have pithy wisdom from ancient Roman tomes such as Juntinan legal thought right next to the equally potent maxim of “Finders Keepers, Losers Weepers”.

 To all the prospective law students out there, the study of law is not what you thought it was going to be. Not that it’s bad in any sense, it’s just that you’re not learning what you see on TV. You don’t really learn to cross-examine a hostile witness in anything but perhaps trial advocacy or by being part of the mock trial team. Two things that most law students don’t ever delve into. You don’t go to law school to learn the state of the law or what the law is on the books currently (well not really). You’re in law school to learn why the law is the way it is and perhaps if you’re lucky, how to apply it.

Law professors have this nasty habit of trundling to death the tired phrase : “you’re in law school to learn how to think like a lawyer”. If you want to know how to do that, just read this. (hat tip to Gilman for that one). That’s right, the study of law is really just playing one very long game of “What if?”.

I think I’ve just become a jaded second year law student.

That’s why they call it the blues

Examinations, especially law school examinations are anti-climactical at best. My contracts exam was no different.

When he walked into our classroom, on the first day of class, our contracts professor, Anthony Chase, told us “Contracts are about the blues. You’ve done me wrong and now you have to make it right.” After our examination on Tuesday, Prof. Chase has several members of our class singing the blues. We had a 178 question multiple choice exam. ‘Not too bad’ you may say but this 178 question beast had to be finished in 3 hours. So that’s 180minutes for 178 questions so a little over a minute per question. ‘Still not too bad’, I hear the peanut gallery retort, but what if I told you that many of the questions were a half page to a page long? Do you think you could just finish reading a question like that in under a minute?

 I’m grateful that I can read rather quickly. What my comprehension is at that rate of speed I’m not sure but I felt like I got a good effort in. Many of my classmates were clamouring for an essay based exam. As if that would be any fairer. We’re all subject to the grade curve anyway. Some of the smartest people in our class still turned in their exams in before time, so has anything really changed? I don’t know. All will be revealed when grades come out. And then the real reason anyone was really fighting for great grades – Law Review- will have been decided.

As first year law students we hang so much of our hopes and dreams on the sharp precipice that is the Law Review cut-off. Eager to make a Faustian bargain just to be privy to the academic elite and walk behind the law school velvet rope to be part of Law Review. Is it all worth it? Is it all that it’s cracked up to be? I don’t know. I want in as much as the next guy.

Law school and Law review in the end is just like any competitive endeavour really. Like making the finals in the Olympics for example. The unfortunate reality is that people seem to only remember who won.

You know you’ve been in law school too long when….

My second dose of humor today came in the form of a legal co-ed who has rarely failed to amuse me.

Ana puts it all in perspective:

I managed to get through my second final without my colon exploding. I’m calling that a success.”

Suddenly my contracts final doesn’t seem so bad. 

For more life and times of this manifestation of George Carlin with curves, read on at http://www.rubyredslipper.blogspot.com/

More Moot Court Madness

As of last week I am a member of both the Mock Trial Team at the University of Houston Law Center as well as the Moot Court Team. The MCs (my way of referring to the Moot Cour Clan) are a rather zany bunch with enough personality to make the study of law remarkably palatable. I had the good fortune of meeting most of them yesterday at our first meet-n-greet and I must say I’m quite chuffed at making the squad.

Proof positive that this bunch works hard and plays hard, I submit below, with permission, an e-mail from the Moot Court board, with the names redacted to protect the innoccent. Methinks I’m going to enjoy this Moot Court Madness….

_ _ _ _

Hi Everybody,

Next Monday and Tuesday from 12 – 1, the current Moot Court Board will interview any of you who would like to join the board for next year.

Perks of being on the Board are:

1.  Planning events around your own calendar

2.  Staffing your “friends” up to “volunteer”

3.  You get to hang with the rest of the Board…a lot.

4.  Have an integral role in keeping The University of Houston Advocacy Program ranked in the top 15 in the US News and World Report (Lord knows the Mock Trial Team needs us)

5.  You won’t have to deal with [Moot Court Board Member] or myself next year

6.  You will get to turn around many of the lasting problems created by [Aforementioned Moot Court Board Member] and myself

7.  Sounds great when you are trying to explain to family and friends why you are still in school

8.  Creates multiple opportunities to not pay attention in class when you reach the end of the internet

9.  Impress civilian women who don’t know what it is, but think it must be important

10.  Help to Keep the party going!

If you are still reading this (you probably should have stopped at around # 2) sign up on the Twen Board.  Interviews should last around 10 minutes.  Feel free to email me any questions.

Signed,

Moot Court Board President

P.S.:  Be prepared to answer some typical Con. Law and Contract hypos.  We only take the best!

P.S.S.:  I was kidding about the Con. Law and Contract hypos.

Parlez-vous Legalese?

Dear Reader,

Not sure if you noticed but I posted all my humor columns from the University of Houston Law School newspaper, Legalese on the blog. You can find the link at the top right hand side of the blog or towards the bottom of the left hand column below ‘recent posts’ and ‘comments’.

Let me know what you think. I hope to continue in the same vein next year as a staff writer and I’ll keep you posted whenever I get to writing next. Actually, a certain dog-loving blogger amongst us will be one of my editors. Spare the corrections and spoil the writer I say!

The Search for Extra-Terrestrial Life begins with your Contracts Text

Ana did a nice bit on why you should use supplemental materials  such as Examples and Explanations, hornbooks etc. While I’ve never used an Emmanuel’s or other commercial briefs I have derived great benefit from the Sum & Substance audio series (particularly for Torts and Civil Procedure) and I found the Law in a Flash -Flashcards to be a good study group exercise. If nothing else they remind you of what needs to be in a good exam answer. 

I’ve been using the Examples & Explanations series for Torts and now for Contracts and I think it’s helped particularly with the fundamentals. What I didn’t expect was assertions of extra-terrestrial life. Yes, you read that correctly. Here’s a quote from the opening remarks on the Objective Test and Common Law views of Offer and Acceptance from Examples & Explanations – Contracts by Brian A. Blum (3rd. ed)

” Mutual assent is the basis of contracts……In some galaxies beyond our solar system, beings have evolved to a point where they can communicate telepathically. Having not yet developed that faculty, we terrestrials can only make our contractual intentions known by communicating them”

Isn’t that just precious?

Guess Mr. Blum watched one too many Star Trek episodes in his time. I would say more but in theory I largely agree with Mr. Blum so I’ll be quiet. Enough blogging for now, I’ve got to go plan my summer trip to Roswell, New Mexico.

My name is Inigo Montoya. You didn’t let me in your law school. Prepare to die!

The ladies at the admissions office at the University of Houston Law Center are certainly a motley crew. They are generally harassed by the prospective masses only to be largely forgotten once we’re in. I happen to deal with them quite frequently because I’ve taken a vested interest in how my law school is run and I try and help them out as much as I can with regards to feedback about the admissions process, the look of the applications material etc. So I was generally quite pleased when they started writing a blog about the admissions process at the UH Law Center. If you haven’t read it and are a prospective student, you certainly should.

With them quoting Inigo Montoya and telling you why an e-mail address such as ‘SexyMama2006′ is virtual insanity they deserve a pat on the back for their efforts to demystify the admissions process. I think it’s a grand idea. Grand enough to warrant a link on my wall of shame i.e. my blog roll.